How to Make More Money From the Traffic You Already Have With Smarter Monetization

Advertisement

The Kadam team talks about how their new Smart Mediation product helps publishers automatically allocate traffic to the best-performing network for each segment, without giving up their existing monetization stack.

Publishers spend a lot of time looking for ways to grow traffic.

But once you get your traffic, another question comes to your mind: are you monetizing each segment of that traffic where it performs best?

That dilemma gets stronger, if you’re using several ad networks.

Each of them has its own reporting, demand, pros and cons across different GEOs, devices and audience types.

A network that looks strong on average may be far less competitive for a particular slice of traffic.

Meanwhile, another source that appears weaker at first glance may actually produce more money from the traffic slice it receives.

Kadam’s new Smart Mediation product is built to solve this problem.

It is designed to get rid of manual decisions of how traffic should be split between networks.

This new instrument compares real performance of each network and each traffic part and changes allocation automatically.

The point is not to rebuild the monetization stack.

It is to make the existing one work harder.

The CPM trap

CPM is usually one of the first numbers publishers look at when comparing monetization from different sources.

And yes, it is definitely useful, but it can also trick you.

As an example, a network shows $2.10 CPM but monetizes 60% of 1,000 impressions, only a part of the traffic it gets.

The publisher earns $1.26 from that initial volume.

The dashboard still looks attractive.

The revenue, however, is less impressive.

This is why Smart Mediation does not treat the shown CPM as the final measure of performance.

It compares sources by what matters at publisher level: the revenue produced from the traffic actually sent to them.

After analyzing the performance data, the instrument can clearly see which source is working best for a specific traffic segment and send more volume to it.

The traffic split is tied to the numbers, and if they change, the split changes too.

There is no universal “best network”

Another weakness of manual optimization is that it often relies on averages.

But monetization is highly fragmented, and the difference in traffic performance can be valuable.

One network can show great performance in one GEO and pretty poor in another.

It can have strong demand for one operating system, while another network has better buyers for a different audience.

Smart Mediation cuts traffic into smaller segments and evaluates sources using signals including operating system, proxy, and user uniqueness.

This allows several networks to be the strongest performer at the same time, just for different parts of the inventory.

Another thing is that you have to constantly change the setup, as demand always changes, advertisers increase or reduce budgets, new GEOs heat up etc.

The setup that worked yesterday, might not be performing great tomorrow.

Kadam Smart Mediation turns that process into an ongoing one allowing you to reduce manual work.

Performance data determines how traffic is divided.

If a source begins producing stronger revenue for a segment, its share can increase.

If another source overtakes it, allocation can shift again.

Kadam becomes another source of demand

The system also adds something publishers cannot get from simply comparing their existing network dashboards: Kadam’s own advertiser demand.

Kadam brings it into the mix, including direct campaigns and retargeting.

Some users are simply worth more to certain advertisers, and this gives publishers a chance to capture that extra value.

With Smart Mediation, Kadam competes for those users alongside the publisher’s other monetization sources.

It receives the traffic only when its demand generates a better result.

It does not automatically receive the inventory.

It has to outperform the alternatives.

Keep the networks. Add the optimization.

When publishers see a new monetization product, an obvious concern might pop up: what happens to the partnerships that are already working?

Do I have to change the existing stack and setups?

And the answer is simple – no, you don’t

Kadam Smart Mediation works with the publisher’s existing setup rather than replacing it.

You can keep your current networks and continue receiving payments from them directly.

The connected sources provide performance data through API integrations, while the mediation layer determines where traffic should go.

For a start, you can try the instrument with one website, see how the allocation performs and expand from there.

Even separate zones inside the same ad network can be treated independently if their economics differ.

Smart Optimization at 0% Mediation Fee

Kadam does not charge publishers a mediation fee on revenue generated through their existing networks.

The fee is 0%.

Kadam’s advertiser demand competes with the publisher’s existing sources on performance.

When it generates the strongest result for a particular traffic segment, it receives more traffic.

The logic is simple: Kadam grows by helping publishers earn more from the traffic they already have.

The revenue that publishers get from the existing networks stays with them, while Kadam demand creates an additional opportunity to earn more from the same traffic.

More value from the same traffic

Kadam Smart Mediation is ultimately about using existing traffic more efficiently.

Instead of relying on averages, static traffic shares or headline CPMs, publishers get a setup that reacts to real performance across different traffic segments.

The value is straightforward: better use of existing demand, less manual optimization and more opportunities to increase revenue without growing traffic volume.

Learn more about Kadam Smart Mediation.

Advertisement